Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Am J Cardiol ; 208: 53-59, 2023 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37812867

ABSTRACT

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) use for circulatory support in cardiogenic shock results in increased left ventricular (LV) afterload. The use of concomitant Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) have been proposed as adjunct devices for LV unloading. The authors sought to compare head-to-head efficacy and safety outcomes between the 2 LV unloading strategies. We conducted a search of Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases to identify studies comparing the use of Impella to IABP in patients on VA-ECMO. The primary outcome of interest was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes included transition to durable LV assist devices/cardiac transplantation, stroke, limb ischemia, need for continuous renal replacement therapy, major bleeding, and hemolysis. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence interval and heterogeneity statistic I2 were calculated using a random-effects model. A total of 7 observational studies with 698 patients were included. Patients on VA-ECMO unloaded with Impella vs IABP had similar risk of short-term all-cause mortality, defined as either 30-day or in-hospital mortality- 60.8% vs 64.9% (RR 0.93 [0.71 to 1.21], I2 = 71%). No significant difference was observed in transition to durable LV assist devices/cardiac transplantation, continuous renal replacement therapy initiation, stroke, or limb ischemia between the 2 strategies. However, the use of VA-ECMO with Impella was associated with increased risk of major bleeding (57.2% vs 39.7%) (RR 1.66 [1.12 to 2.44], I2 = 82%) and hemolysis (31% vs 7%) (RR 4.61 [1.24 to 17.17], I2 = 66%) compared with VA-ECMO, along with IABP. In conclusion, in patients requiring VA-ECMO for circulatory support, the concomitant use of Impella or IABP had comparable short-term mortality. However, Impella use was associated with increased risk of major bleeding and hemolysis.


Subject(s)
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Heart-Assist Devices , Stroke , Humans , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Hemolysis , Shock, Cardiogenic , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping/methods , Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects , Stroke/etiology , Hemorrhage/etiology , Treatment Outcome
2.
Expert Opin Investig Drugs ; 31(10): 1017-1025, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36094001

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is an increasingly well-recognized condition encountered in clinical practice. Diagnosis and treatment remain extremely challenging. The limited success of currently available therapies has laid the foundation for a number of experimental therapies. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we will briefly outline the pathophysiology and clinical features of this syndrome, before moving on to its management, with a specific focus on experimental pharmacological therapies. Finally, we briefly discuss POTS related to the SARS CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic. EXPERT OPINION: Despite tremendous advances, the diagnosis and management of POTS remains extremely challenging. The multitude of contributory mechanisms, which predominate to varying degrees in different patients further complicates management. Improved characterization of pathophysiological phenotypes is essential to individualize management. Lifestyle measures form the first line of therapy, followed by beta-blockers, ivabradine, fludrocortisone, and midodrine. Supplemental therapies such as iron, vitamin D and α lipoic acid are quite safe and a trial of their use is reasonable. The use of erythropoietin, IVIG, desmopressin, etc., are more specialized and nuanced alternatives. In recent years, interest has grown in the use of cardiac neuromodulation. Though preliminary, some of these therapies are quite promising.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Erythropoietin , Midodrine , Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome , Thioctic Acid , Deamino Arginine Vasopressin/therapeutic use , Fludrocortisone/therapeutic use , Humans , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/therapeutic use , Iron/therapeutic use , Ivabradine/therapeutic use , Midodrine/therapeutic use , Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome/diagnosis , Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome/drug therapy , Therapies, Investigational , Thioctic Acid/therapeutic use , Vitamin D/therapeutic use
3.
Eur Heart J Open ; 2(2): oeac019, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35919116

ABSTRACT

Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of P2Y12 inhibitor or aspirin monotherapy for secondary prevention in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Methods and results: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were searched to identify randomized trials comparing monotherapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor versus aspirin for secondary prevention in patients with ASCVD (cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, or peripheral artery disease). The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Secondary outcomes were myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, all-cause mortality, and major bleeding. A random-effects model was used to calculate risk ratios (RR) and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) and heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the Higgins I2 value. A total of 9 eligible trials (5 with clopidogrel and 4 with ticagrelor) with 61 623 patients were included in our analyses. Monotherapy with P2Y12 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of MACE by 11% (0.89, 95% CI 0.84-0.95, I2 = 0%) and MI by 19% (0.81, 95% CI 0.71-0.92, I2 = 0%) compared with aspirin monotherapy. There was no significant difference in the risk of stroke (0.85, 95% CI 0.73-1.01), or all-cause mortality (1.01, 95% CI 0.92-1.11). There was also no significant difference in the risk of major bleeding with P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy compared with aspirin (0.94, 95% CI 0.72-1.22, I2 = 42.6%). Results were consistent irrespective of the P2Y12 inhibitor used. Conclusion: P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy for secondary prevention is associated with a significant reduction in atherothrombotic events compared with aspirin alone without an increased risk of major bleeding.

4.
Am J Cardiol ; 181: 94-101, 2022 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35999070

ABSTRACT

Cardiogenic shock is associated with high short-term mortality. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is increasingly used as a mechanical circulatory support strategy for patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. A drawback of this hemodynamic support strategy is increased left ventricular (LV) afterload, which is mitigated by concomitant use of Impella (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with Impella [ECPELLA]). However, data regarding the benefits of this approach are limited. We conducted a systematic search of Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases to identify studies including patients with cardiogenic shock reporting clinical outcomes with Impella plus VA-ECMO compared with VA-ECMO alone. Primary outcome was short-term all-cause mortality (in-hospital or 30-day mortality). Secondary outcomes included major bleeding, hemolysis, continuous renal replacement therapy, weaning from mechanical circulatory support, limb ischemia, and transition to destination therapy with LV assist device (LVAD) or cardiac transplant. Of 2,790 citations, 7 observational studies were included. Of 1,054 patients with cardiogenic shock, 391 were supported with ECPELLA (37%). Compared with patients on only VA-ECMO support, patients with ECPELLA had a lower risk of short-term mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.89 [0.80 to 0.99], I2 = 0%, p = 0.04) and were significantly more likely to receive a heart transplant/LVAD (RR 2.03 [1.44 to 2.87], I2 = 0%, p <0.01). However, patients with ECPELLA had a higher risk of hemolysis (RR 2.03 [1.60 to 2.57], I2 = 0%, p <0.001), renal failure requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (RR 1.46 [1.23 to 174], I2 = 11%, p <0.0001), and limb ischemia (RR 1.67 [1.15 to 2.43], I2 = 0%, p = 0.01). In conclusion, among patients with cardiogenic shock requiring VA-ECMO support, concurrent LV unloading with Impella had a lower likelihood of short-term mortality and a higher likelihood of progression to durable LVAD or heart transplant. However, patients supported with ECPELLA had higher rates of hemolysis, limb ischemia, and renal failure requiring continuous renal replacement therapy. Future prospective randomized are needed to define the optimal treatment strategy in this high-risk cohort.


Subject(s)
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Heart-Assist Devices , Renal Insufficiency , Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects , Hemolysis , Humans , Renal Insufficiency/etiology , Shock, Cardiogenic/etiology
5.
Cardiol Rev ; 30(2): 70-74, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34369408

ABSTRACT

Eosinophilic myocarditis is a clinical condition whereby myocardial injury is mediated by eosinophilic infiltration. A number of underlying causes, including reactive, clonal, or idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome, may trigger eosinophilia. Disease presentation may vary from mild subclinical variants to fulminant myocarditis with thromboembolic complications, and in some cases, endomyocardial and valvular fibrosis may be seen. A detailed examination coupled with the use of multimodality imaging, and endomyocardial biopsy may help establish diagnosis. Treatment is aimed at symptomatic management and treating the underlying cause of eosinophilia, such as withdrawal of implicated drugs, antihelminthic therapy for infection, immunosuppression for autoimmune conditions, and targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in cases with clonal myeloid disorders.


Subject(s)
Hypereosinophilic Syndrome , Hypersensitivity , Myocarditis , Heart , Humans , Hypereosinophilic Syndrome/diagnosis , Hypereosinophilic Syndrome/drug therapy , Myocarditis/diagnosis , Myocarditis/etiology , Myocardium
6.
Stroke ; 52(6): e217-e223, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33902301

ABSTRACT

Background and Purpose: Antiplatelet therapy is key for preventing thrombotic events after transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke. Although the role of aspirin is well established, there is emerging evidence for the role of short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in preventing recurrent stroke. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and study-level meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes of early initiation of short-term DAPT (aspirin+P2Y12 inhibitor for up to 3 months) versus aspirin alone in patients with acute stroke or transient ischemic attack. Primary efficacy outcome was risk of recurrent stroke and primary safety outcome was incidence of major bleeding. Secondary outcomes studied were risk of any ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, major adverse cardiovascular events, and all-cause death. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and CIs were calculated using a random-effects model. Results: Four trials with a total of 21 459 patients were included. As compared to aspirin alone, DAPT had a lower risk of recurrent stroke (RR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.68­0.83]; P<0.001; I2=0%) but a higher risk of major bleeding events (RR, 2.22 [95% CI, 1.14­4.34], P=0.02, I2=46.5%). Patients receiving DAPT had a lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (RR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.69­0.84], P<0.001, I2=0%) and recurrent ischemic events (RR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.67­0.82], P<0.001, I2=0%). Conclusions: As compared to aspirin alone, short-term DAPT within 24 hours of high-risk transient ischemic attack or mild-moderate ischemic stroke reduces the risk of recurrent stroke at the expense of higher risk of major bleeding.


Subject(s)
Aspirin/administration & dosage , Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy/methods , Ischemic Attack, Transient/drug therapy , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Stroke/drug therapy , Aspirin/adverse effects , Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy/adverse effects , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Humans , Ischemic Attack, Transient/diagnosis , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Stroke/diagnosis , Time-to-Treatment
8.
Interv Cardiol Clin ; 9(3): 403-407, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32471680

ABSTRACT

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury is a common complication in patients undergoing invasive procedures and is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. There is no effective approach to the management of this complication, and prevention remains of paramount importance. The 3 pillars of prevention are identification of high-risk patients, appropriate hydration before and after contrast exposure, eGFR-based contrast dosing and use of ultra-low contrast volume in high-risk patients. Most evidence supporting these practices is derived from patients undergoing coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention but these basic principles can be applied to most patients undergoing contrast-based procedures in the catheterization laboratory.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/chemically induced , Acute Kidney Injury/prevention & control , Catheterization/adverse effects , Contrast Media/adverse effects , Kidney/drug effects , Acetylcysteine/administration & dosage , Acetylcysteine/therapeutic use , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Acute Kidney Injury/mortality , Case-Control Studies , Catheterization/statistics & numerical data , Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Coronary Angiography/adverse effects , Coronary Angiography/methods , Fluid Therapy/standards , Free Radical Scavengers/administration & dosage , Free Radical Scavengers/therapeutic use , Glomerular Filtration Rate/drug effects , Glomerular Filtration Rate/physiology , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Incidence , Kidney/physiopathology , Laboratories/statistics & numerical data , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Factors , Risk Reduction Behavior , Rosuvastatin Calcium/administration & dosage , Rosuvastatin Calcium/therapeutic use
10.
J Clin Diagn Res ; 11(4): OC09-OC13, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28571182

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Autonomic Neuropathy (AN), found to be a strong predictor of sudden cardiac death, has been reported variably in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). Manifesting as sweating disturbances, gastrointestinal irregularities, bladder or erectile dysfunction, AN can significantly affect a patient's quality of life and alter the course of the disease. AIM: This study was undertaken to find out the prevalence and severity of AN in RA patients attending the Rheumatology Clinic at a Tertiary Care Hospital in New Delhi, India and also to investigate its correlation with patient and disease factors such as age, gender, disease severity, duration and serological status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, AN was assessed subjectively by a survey of autonomic symptoms. Cardiac autonomic involvement was assessed by five cardiovascular reflex tests as described by Ewing: Heart Rate (HR) response to deep breathing, standing, and Valsalva and Blood Pressure (BP) response to standing and sustained handgrip. RESULTS: A total of 31 RA patients and 31 age and sex matched healthy volunteers were recruited. Upon analysis it was found that the prevalence of cardiac AN was significantly higher in patients (80.65%) as compared to controls (51.61%) (p=0.016). Positive correlation with disease severity was observed with the patient reported questionnaire but not with the objective cardiovascular reflex tests. No significant correlation between grade of AN and patient's age, gender, disease duration or serological status was established. CONCLUSION: At the end of the study, it was concluded that the pathological mechanisms responsible for autonomic dysfunction are more active in RA as compared to others.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...